Study unravels health impact, interplay of diet soft drinks and overall diet
|Study unravels health impact, interplay of diet soft drinks and overall diet|
|March 28, 2012|
Are diet sodas good or bad for you? The jury is still out, but a new UNC-led study sheds light on the impact that zero-calorie beverages may have on health, especially in the context of a person’s overall dietary habits.For the average person, the scientific evidence can seem confusing. A number of studies have implicated diet beverage consumption as a cause of cardiovascular disease. Others have suggested such drinks may be a viable tactic for people who are trying to lose or control their weight.
Either way, most previous research has tended to focus either on people’s drinking patterns and preferences or their overall dietary habits. In other words, most studies have failed to tease apart how those two aspects interact to affect people’s health.
To address this problem, a new study led by Kiyah Duffey, PhD, research assistant professor of nutrition at UNC’s Gillings School of Global Public Health, examined not only people’s beverage consumption patterns but also the diets of those who consume diet and sugar-sweetened beverages. The findings appear in the April issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Duffey, study author and research assistant professor of nutrition at UNC’s public health school, said that similar to previous studies, the new analysis found that people who consumed diet beverages tended to be less healthy than people who did not consume them.
“However, there was an important interplay between overall diet and what people drink,” Duffey said. “It is important that people consider the entirety of their diet before they consider switching to or adding diet beverages, because without doing so, they may not realize the health benefits they were hoping to see.”
Researchers studied data collected over 20 years from more than 4,000 young adults who participated in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.
In terms of eating habits, participants fell into two groups: people who ate what researchers dubbed a “prudent” diet (one with more fruit, fish, whole grains, nuts and milk) and individuals who consumed a “western” diet (which had higher amounts of fast food, meat and poultry, and pizza and snacks).
People who were healthiest tended to be those who ate a prudent diet and did not consume diet beverages. They had a lower risk of high waist circumference, high triglyceride levels and metabolic syndrome (22 percent, 28 percent and 36 percent lower, respectively, than people who ate a western diet and did not drink diet beverages). But the second healthiest group was individuals with a prudent diet who also consumed diet beverages.
In contrast, individuals who consumed the western diet had increased risk of heart disease, regardless of whether or not they drank diet beverages.
The UNC researchers found that many dietary factors contributed to a person’s overall health. Without taking diet beverage consumption into account, people who ate the prudent diet had significantly better cholesterol and triglyceride profiles and significantly lower risks of hypertension and metabolic syndrome than those who ate the western diet.
“Our study confirms the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association and many weight-loss programs,” Duffey said, “which suggest people drink these beverages as a way to cut calories and lose or control weight, but only in the context of the whole diet.”
The new study is titled “Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.”
Other authors were Barry M. Popkin, PhD, W. R. Kenan Jr. Distinguished Professor of Nutrition at UNC and a member of the Carolina Population Center; Linda Van Horn, PhD, professor of preventive medicine at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; and David R. Jacobs Jr., PhD, Mayo Professor of Public Health at the University of Minnesota’s School of Public Health.
|Last updated May 17, 2012|